易中天品曹操 无情未必真豪杰

易中天品人录 曹操:五 无情未必真豪杰.

其实曹操也未必多想杀人。他原本是非常热爱生命热爱生活,也非常重感情的

  曹操虽然残忍,却并不暴虐;冷酷,却并非无情。残忍和冷酷不是他的天性,是他在残酷的政治斗争和军事斗争中被逼出来的。所以,他杀人不眨眼,却并不以杀人为乐;执法不讲情面,却又通情达理。

  郭嘉英年早逝,曹操悲痛得死去活来。他给朝廷上表,给荀彧写信,同荀攸等人议论郭嘉,每每痛哭流涕,声泪俱下。..

  甚至对于背叛了自己的朋友,曹操也很看重当年的情谊。陈宫和曹操有过一段不平常的交往,曹操出任兖州牧,就是陈宫的功劳。后来,因诛杀边让一案,陈宫离开曹操,投奔了吕布,而且死心塌地地帮吕布打曹操,被俘以后,也死不肯投降。.. 陈宫昂首就刑,曹操流着眼泪,为他送行。陈宫死后,曹操赡养了他的老母,还为他女儿出了聘,对他们家比当初是朋友时还要好。

最能体现出曹操之重情的,大约还是在他临终之际。 ..

曹操南征北战,戎马一生,享受天伦的时间不多,因此对家人的感情特别珍惜。他在临终前还说过这样的话,他说:我一生所作所为,没有什么可后悔的,也不觉得对不起谁,惟独不知到了九泉之下,如果子修向我要妈妈,我该怎么回答。子修就是曹昂,是曹操的长子。曹昂的生母刘夫人早逝,便由没有生育的正室丁夫人抚育,丁夫人也视为己出。后来曹昂阵亡,丁夫人哭得死去活来,又常常哭着骂着数落曹操:把我儿子杀了,你也不管。曹操一烦,便把她打发回了娘家,因此去世前有这样的说法。

  其实曹操还是作过努力的。他亲自到丁夫人娘家去接她,丁夫人却坐在织布机前织她的布,动都不动,理都不理。曹操便抚着她的背,很温柔地说:我们一起坐车回家去,好不好呀?丁夫人不理他。曹操走到门外,又回过头来问:跟我回去,行不行呀?丁夫人还是不理他。曹操没有办法,只好和她分手。以曹操脾气之暴躁,为人之凶狠,做到这一步已很不简单。何况曹操还让丁夫人改嫁,不让她守活寡,只是丁夫人不肯,她父母也不敢。当然不敢的。就是敢嫁,也没人敢娶。:)

曹操临终前放心不下的,还有小儿子曹干。曹干三岁时,生母陈姬就去世了,这时也才五岁。于是曹操又专门给曹丕下了一道遗令:“此儿三岁亡母,五岁失父,以累汝也。”

鲁迅先生说:“无情未必真豪杰,怜子如何不丈夫。”曹操怜子,项羽别姬,他们都是性情中人,也都是真豪杰,大丈夫。

易中天品三国 崔琰与杨修之死

在电视上看易中天品三国之命案真相后,我在网上发现有易中天品三国的全文

杨修之死可以说是咎由自取。但是崔琰的死实在可惜。
据史书记载,崔琰因为牵扯一个蹊跷的文字狱案件被曹操杀死。可以说是曹操随便找个理由杀死崔琰。

(易中天品三国 命案真相)
..
曹操秘密征求立储的意见,崔琰公开作答,叫做“露板”,就是发表公开信。那么你要知道,曹操秘密征求意见这是个规矩啊,这种事情是不能公开征求意见的,你崔琰公开作答是不是坏了规矩,这是第一点。第二点,你为什么要公开作答?人家都秘密回信,你这不是刻意作秀吗?表示你光明正大是不是?表示你没有嫌疑是不是?表示你不会因为曹植的妻子是你的侄女你就结党营私,你想表现这个对不对?曹操不满。第三,就算崔琰没有这个意思,没有作秀的意思,他只是心怀坦荡,他只是大公无私,但是你公开作答不显得曹操的秘密征求意见有点鬼鬼祟祟吗?你这样不就把曹操就比下去了吗?曹操能够容忍吗?何况这个时候大权在握的曹操已经是杀人魔王一个了。

想必曹操不愿让人知道他在立储之事还是摇摆不定,崔琰实在不应该公开的发表意见。

易中天品人录 曹操的几桩谋杀案.

Gorgeous Photos of the Sky from Above

View at boston.com.
The Space Shuttle Discovery successfully launched last week, becoming the 154th manned US space mission.
One of the best features of the space program has always been astronaut photography.

It would be really unbelievable if we can just fly around and view it ourselves. 8)

Related:
Mysterious Night-Shining Clouds.

In Desperate Times, Burmese Turn to their Monks

From IHT.

It is a scene Myanmar’s ruling generals are unlikely to see played out for themselves: As a convoy of trucks carrying relief supplies, led by Buddhist monks, passed through storm-devastated villages, hungry children and homeless mothers bowed in supplication and respect.

“When I see those people, I want to cry,” said Sitagu Sayadaw, 71, one of Myanmar’s most respected senior monks.

Recently, people who had taken shelter at monasteries or gathered on roadsides waiting for aid to arrive were being displaced again, this time by the junta, which wants them to stop being an embarrassment to the government and return to their villages “for reconstruction.” UN officials said Friday that refugees were also being evicted from government-run camps.

“In my entire life, I have never seen a hospital. I don’t know where the government office is. I can’t buy anything in the market because I lost everything to the cyclone,” said Thi Dar. “So I came to the monk.”

Nay Lin, 36, a volunteer doctor at the Kun Wan clinic, one of the six emergency clinic shelters Sitagu has opened in the delta, said: “Our patients suffer from infected wounds, abdominal pains and vomiting. They also need counseling for mental trauma, anxiety and depression.”

Since the cyclone, the Burmese have become even closer to the monks while their alienation from the junta grows. This bodes ill for the government, which brutally cracked down on thousands of monks when they took to the streets last September appealing to the generals to improve conditions for the people.

Village after storm-hit village, it is clear who has won people’s hearts.

Monasteries in the delta - those still standing after the storm - were clogged with refugees. People went there with donations or as volunteers. Monasteries that served as religious centers, orphanages and homes for the elderly were now also shelters for the homeless.

“The monks’ role is more important than ever,” said Ar Sein Na, 46, a monk in the delta village of That Kyar. “In a time of immense suffering like this, people have nowhere to go except to monks.”

Kyi Than, 38, said she had traveled 25 kilometers by boat to Sitagu’s camp.

“Our village monk died during the storm. I felt so good today having my first chance to talk to a monk since the storm. Monks are like parents to us,” she said. “The government wants us to shut up, but monks listen to us.”

“Meditation cannot remove this disaster. Material support is very important now,” Sitagu said. “Now in our country, spiritual and material support are unbalanced.”

However, like other senior monks here he must strike a careful balance. He has the moral duty to speak out on behalf of his suffering people but he must also protect his social programs and hospitals, which provide free medical care to the destitute in a country whose government views such private undertakings as a reproof.

But, speaking at his shelter as an afternoon monsoon rain drummed against the roof, Sitagu sounded frustrated with the government.

“In my country, I cannot see a real political leader. General Than Shwe’s ‘Burmese way to democracy?”‘ he said, referring to the junta’s top leader. “What is it?”

Still, a 40-year-old monk at Sitagu’s camp said that “monks are very angry” about the government’s recent move to evict refugees from monasteries, roadside huts and other temporary shelters, even while the state-run media are filled with stories of government relief efforts. “The government doesn’t want to show the truth.”

A young monk in the Chaukhtatgyi Paya monastery district in Yangon predicted trouble ahead. “You will see it again because everyone is angry and everyone is jobless,” said the monk, who said he joined the September “saffron revolution” and had a large gash over his right eye from a soldier’s beating to show for it.

A monk from Mon State in southern Myanmar, who was visiting the delta to assess the damage and arrange an aid shipment, said: “For the government, these people are no more than dead animals in the fields.”

The interdependence between monks and lay people is age-old. Monks receive alms - food, medicine, clothes, cash to buy books - from the laity. In return, they offer spiritual comfort. In villages without government schools, a monastic education is often the only one available for children.

“There is a relationship of reciprocity between monks and the lay people,” said Desmond Chou, a Burmese-born scholar of comparative religion in New Delhi. “If a fire breaks out in a Myanmar village, it is usually the monks, not firefighters, who arrive first to rescue the people.”

Related:
Doctors Without Borders Providing Aid in Myanmar and China.
Anger Grows over Myanmar Aid Block.

Myanmar Disaster And The Human Tragedy of Global Capitalism.

Dalai Lama Offers Support to Myanmar Monks.

Rare and Beautiful Photos of the Snow Leopard

From NationalGeographic, by photographer Steve Winter.

Related:
Amur Leopard Near Extinction.

Myanmar Disaster And The Human Tragedy of Global Capitalism

From CounterCurrents.org by Li Onesto.

.. The areas hit by the cyclone make up half of the irrigated farmland in Myanmar—which had produced 65 percent of Myanmar’s rice. Millions of people who survived are now facing hunger, disease and lack of shelter.

There is tremendous wealth, resources, and technology in the world that could be used to respond to this disaster. There is no shortage of people with skills and compassion that could be mobilized to help. But clearly, this is not happening.

To understand the situation in Myanmar today you have to examine two interpenetrating contradictions. One is the relations between the world imperialist system and Myanmar as a poor country oppressed and dominated by global capitalism. The other dynamic is the geostrategic importance of Myanmar to imperialism and the rivalry between different capitalist countries in the region. These larger factors have deeply influenced the extent and character of the destruction caused by the cyclone, as well as the rescue and relief efforts.

Natural disasters do not “discriminate”—people all over the world are hit by tornados, hurricanes, and earthquakes. But different people and different countries are not affected equally.

We live in a hugely lopsided world where a handful of rich, imperialist countries dominates the rest of the planet. The U.S. sits at the top of a global capitalist system driven and shaped by the maximization of profit. The majority of people live in poor countries oppressed and dominated by imperialism and by social-economic structures that reflect and reinforce the interests of local elites who are subordinate to imperialism. Development of these countries has been stunted and distorted by imperialism. And all this profoundly affects the capacity and ability of governments and people to respond to a natural disaster.

As Debarati Guha-Sapir, Director of the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters in Brussels, said: “The villages are in such levels of desperation — housing quality, nutritional status, roads, bridges, dams — that losses were more determined by their condition rather than the force of the cyclone.”

The official storyline says: Myanmar is run by a bunch of dictators who chose to isolate themselves from the rest of the world.

Reality: Myanmar society is repressive and relatively closed off from the outside world. The reactionary military regime seeks to maintain power and control society through brutal force and by limiting contact with the rest of the world. But this is not why the U.S. criticizes Myanmar.

What the U.S. really means when it says Myanmar has “isolated” itself is that Myanmar has not fully opened its doors to U.S. imperialism. The military regime has not been completely pliable, compliant, and subservient to the United States. And now it has refused to accept aid from the U.S. that has all kinds of conditions and potential “strings attached”—such as Bush’s insistence that Myanmar open its borders to U.S. officials, aid workers and military personnel.

U.S. sanctions on Myanmar (that began in 1997 and have since been extended) ban new investments in the country and prohibit imports into the U.S. from Myanmar. The U.S. says it maintains these sanctions because of human rights abuses. But in fact, this U.S. “isolation” of Myanmar is aimed at undermining and destabilizing the government and creating conditions to bring to power a regime more subservient to the United States.

Historically and up to today, Myanmar’s development has been conditioned by its integration into and subordination to the global system of imperialism.

Myanmar has the world’s tenth largest gas reserves. It has been producing natural gas since the 1970s. Today, gas exports are Myanmar’s most important source of national income.

In the 1990s Myanmar granted gas concessions to foreign companies from France and Great Britain. Later Texaco and Unocal (now absorbed into ChevronTexaco) gained rights to Myanmar’s gas as well.

In 2005 other countries in the region, including China, Thailand, and South Korea invested in Myanmar’s oil and gas industry.

In 1996 a human rights suit was filed against the American-based Unocal Corp. A group of villagers accused Unocal of using forced labor conscripted by Myanmar soldiers. Villagers were raped, murdered, and brutally relocated during the construction of a $1.2 billion gas pipeline to Thailand, started in 1990.

The suit, which Unocal settled in 2004, brought to light the kind of horrible crimes that were being committed by a consortium of foreign companies, including Unocal, all of which were receiving support and protection from the military regime.

Beyond the interest of imperialism in profiting off the resources and people in Myanmar there is the geostrategic importance of this in the world. And this is a big factor in how the U.S. and various international forces look at their relationship with Myanmar and how they have responded to the current disaster.

.. .. ..

“The U.S. State Department has recruited and trained key opposition leaders from numerous anti-government organizations in Myanmar. Since 2003, the U.S. has provided the NED with more than $2.5 million a year for activities that promote a regime change in Myanmar. The NED funds key opposition media including the New Era Journal, Irrawaddy and the Democratic Voice of Burma radio…

Today in such human catastrophes, the outmoded economic, political and social relations of imperialism stand out in stark relief. The world needs revolution, and things could be a different way. In a whole new socialist society power would be in the hands of the people. Society’s resources and knowledge and, most especially, the compassion, creativity, and political consciousness of the masses, could and would be fully mobilized to build a whole new emancipating society that will be able to figure out and solve all kinds of problems, including how to deal with natural disasters.

Old Age is a Gift

I read it from Inspirationline.

The other day a young person asked me how I felt about being old.
I was taken aback, for I do not think of myself as old. Upon seeing my
reaction, she was immediately embarrassed, but I explained that
it was an interesting question, and I would ponder it, and let her know.

Old Age, I’ve decided, is a gift.
I am now, probably for the first time in my life,
the person I have always wanted to be.

Oh, not my body … the wrinkles, the baggy eyes, and the
sagging butt. And often I am taken aback by that old person
that lives in my mirror (who looks like my mother!), but I don’t
agonize over those things for long.

I would never trade my amazing friends,
my wonderful life, my loving family for
less gray hair or a flatter belly.

As I’ve aged, I’ve become kinder to myself,
and less critical of myself. I’ve become my own friend
.
I don’t chide myself for eating that extra cookie, or for not making
my bed, or for buying that silly cement gecko that I didn’t need,
but looks so avante garde on my patio. I am entitled to a
treat, to be messy, to be extravagant.

I have seen too many dear friends leave
this world too soon; before they understood the
great freedom that comes with aging.

Whose business is it if I choose to read or play on the
computer until 4 AM and sleep until noon?
I will dance with myself to those wonderful tunes of the 60 &70’s,
and if I, at the same time, wish to weep over a lost love … I will.
I will walk the beach in a swim suit that is stretched over a bulging body,
and will dive into the waves with abandon if I choose to,
despite the pitying glances from the jet set.
They, too, will get old.

I know I am sometimes forgetful.
But there again, some of life is just as well forgotten.
And I eventually remember the important things.

Sure, over the years my heart has been broken.
How can your heart not break when you lose a loved one,
or when a child suffers, or even when somebody’s beloved pet
gets hit by a car? But broken hearts are what give us
strength and understanding and compassion.
A heart never broken is pristine and sterile and
will never know the joy of being imperfect.

I am so blessed to have lived long enough to have
my hair turning gray, and to have my youthful laughs
be forever etched into deep grooves on my face.

So many have never laughed, and so many have
died before their hair could turn silver.
As you get older, it is easier to be positive.
You care less about what other people think.

I don’t question myself anymore. I’ve even earned
the right to be wrong. So, to answer your question,
I like being old — it has set me free.

I like the person I have become.
I am not going to live forever, but while I am still here,
I will not waste time lamenting what could have been,
or worrying about what will be.

And I shall eat icecream every single day
(if I feel like it).